When The Water Ends: Africa’s Climate Conflicts
October 28, 2010Urine as a Commercial Fertilizer?
October 29, 2010
PHILADELPHIA — For years, subway cars have been able to recycle some of the energy created when they brake, turning it into electricity to help power the train or others running on the rails at the same time.
The problem is it’s a short-term benefit, with much of the energy wasted by the time the train stops braking. Now, transit agencies in Philadelphia and other cities across the country are hoping to harness that lost energy by storing it in batteries and putting it back into the system, something that could potentially save millions of dollars in energy costs.
“What we’re wasting here is the kinetic energy of a moving train,” said Andrew Gillespie, chief engineer of power for Philadelphia’s transit agency, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He estimates that 50 to 70 percent of that power is wasted.
The idea of storing the power is an enticing one for transit agencies, especially with ridership up and systems expanding. Many of their systems are getting overwhelmed and power costs are spiking.
The Metropolitan Transit Agency in New York is in the early stages of storing such power, while agencies in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., are looking at doing so, too.
What some electric trains do now is take the resistance created by braking and turn it into energy that goes back into the train car’s motor, or onto the third rail where other trains running on the tracks at the same time can use it.
But only about 30 percent of that power is captured, Gillespie estimated, with the rest dissipating, unharnessed.
Working with a private energy company and a $900,000 grant from the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority, SEPTA is setting out on a pilot program along one of its train lines that would use a massive battery system to store the energy created. Then, that power could be used on the system later or possibly be put back into the grid.
The test run is slated for the Letterly power substation on the Market-Frankford line in Philadelphia’s Kensington section.
After it’s complete, likely sometime next year, the agency will start testing it and deciding whether to expand the effort to its other 37 electrical substations, Gillespie said.
Ultimately, SEPTA hopes to save up to 10 percent on power costs on a system that takes $22 million a year to power.
The American Public Transit Association is studying the potential benefits of what is known as “wayside storage,” storing such energy somewhere other than the rails or the car itself, both of which have limited capacity, said Martin Schroeder, APTA’s chief engineer.
“Instead of burning it up on top of the car, you put that additional current into battery storage,” he said. The biggest challenge, Schroeder said, will likely be the costs of the batteries, which can be hundreds of thousands of dollars each.
In conjunction with Conshohocken-based Viridity Energy, SEPTA hopes to start construction on its storage devices in 2011.
SEPTA wants to see how it works at one substation first. It will gather data by the end of next year and monitor the energy savings to ensure costs aren’t somehow subsequently going up elsewhere in the system, Gillespie said.
“SEPTA needs a storage device so they can avoid wasting energy that their trains produce,” said Audrey Zibelman, president and CEO of Viridity Energy.
The project could also allow SEPTA to sell surplus energy to PJM Interconnection, which operates the regional grid, Zibelman said. That could potentially generate $500,000 from one storage battery.
“It has a double benefit,” she said.
But Schroeder said that might also involve making more and potentially costly changes to the substation.
“There’s some trickiness in how the substations work,” he said.
That’s just one of many things that still need to be studied before transit agencies can know how much braking energy can actually be recycled, and how much money can potentially be saved, he said.
Source: The Huffington Post
While we are still using fossil fuels, we need to harvest as much waste energy as possible from it to reduce our carbon footprint. The ultimate goal should be to replace fossil fuels for cleaner, renewable energy sources such as solar energy.
Solar energy technology is also surging ahead- the solar photovoltaic panels and solar geysers of 20 years ago are archaic compared to the current solar technology. Solar power for homes is a practical proposition for many homeowners. While initial costs may seem high, with our current electricity tariffs in South Africa, a solar water heater typically pays for itself within 36 months. Solar can also be a marketable home improvement and there is the added bonus that you are reducing your carbon footprint.
Water Rhapsody Water Conservation Systems has incorporated Yes Solar Mpumalanga so that we can offer solar water heating systems to further reduce your environmental impact (water and energy are linked). Yes Solar is a distributor for Solsquare Solar Solutions- high quality German-engineered solar energy systems that are competitively priced. Solsquare solar geysers are SABS- and Eskom-approved and are fitted by qualified, Eskom-accredited solar installers.
Our water and solar systems will save the environment while you save money on water and electricity bills; get free water and free water heating!
Contact us for a free quote on a solar geyser, rainwater harvesting system, grey water system or water tank (we are JoJo Tanks dealers for the full range of JoJo water tanks, JoJo tank stands and also supply Atlas Plastics water tanks).
